Read the source and answer the question. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right. -U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Holmes, Schenck v. United States, 1919 15. Which statement describes the impact of this case? (US.26) A. This cese established limits on the freedom of speech B. This case recognized the rights of the individual during a time of war. C. This ruling led to an amendment being created to expand free speech. D. This tuling determined the authorization needed for military mobilization.