Home
/
Business
/
work situation: ayanna has worked for the same company for 15 years, when it was acquired by a multi-national corporation. ayanna is

Question

Work Situation: Ayanna has worked for the same company for 15 years, when it was acquired by a multi-national corporation. Ayanna Is very anxious about her own future in the new company, as there have been rumors flying around for weeks about possible layoffs .She is having a meeting this morning with the new executives of the company. This is her first meating with them choo the acquisition was announced. If you were Ayanna ,which responses would be the most cificative and least citiesting? Choose One LEAST EFFECTIVE Choose One MOSTETECTIVE Be prepared to explain your record with the company; they can't let you go If they see your value. Start looking for another Job now as you may beliet coat any time and better opportunities might be evallable anyway. Listen to what the executives have to say but be way about a possible job loss and look for other indications of an upcoming downstaing. Let them know how excited you are about the now acquisition; this is a great opportunity for the company.

Answer

4.5 (306 Votes)
Verificación de expertos
Glenna Elite · Tutor for 8 years

Answer

## Most effective response is: Let them know how exctted you are about the new acquisition; this is a great opportunity for the company. (Response D) ## Least effective response is: Start looking for another job now as you may be let go at any time and better opportunities might be avallable anyway. (Response B)

Explanation

## Step 1: Understanding the ScenarioThis problem involves a scenario were Ayanna, who has been with the same company for 15 years, is facing potential changes due to her company being acquired by a multinational corporation. There are rumors about layoffs which heightens her anxiousness. The potential responses at this critical juncture form the crux of the problem. We have to identify which responses would be the most and the least effective ones, carefully by considering the wider context.## Step 2: Analyzing the ResponsesHere, we need to analyze individual responses to address the effectiveness:### Response A: Be prepared to explain your record with the company, they can't let you go if they see your value. Being prepared to show her contribution to the company over last 15 years could emphasize her value and can be an effective communication strategy.### Response B: Start looking for another job now as you may be let go at any time and better opportunities might be avallable anyway. While this response may account for self-preservation, conveying this approach might showcase a lapsing trust or engagement with the current company which is perceivably negative.### Response C: Listen to what the executives have to say but be wary about a possible job loss and look for other indications of an upcoming downsizing. This choice shows blend a of respect for the new leadership, preparedness and realism about the potential risk. Here updates about the company's downsizing will help mitigate potential damage from possible relocation.### Response D: Let them know how exctted you are about the new acquisition; this is a great opportunity for the company. Demonstrating a positive attitude towards change signals an adaptable and commerce-forward mindset which is typically appreciated in corporate culture and can be an effective approach.## Step 3: Filter Most and Least Effective StrategiesBased on analyzing all responses, we can conclude which response is the most effective and which one is the least effective.