Question
Having the Congress involved gives the Supreme Court time to weigh in on the decision. Why is the second step in the graphic necessary when filling appointed public offices at the national level? Having a branch of Congress involved allows it to filibuster the confirmation process. Having the Congress involved allows it to select its own appointee. Having a branch of Congress involved helps to balance the powers of the executive branch. 1 po
Answer
4.1
(344 Votes)
Eli
Veteran · Tutor for 9 years
Answer
#ExplanationThe question refers to the process of filling appointed public offices at the national level in the United States. This process typically involves the executive branch (the President) nominating individuals for certain positions, and the legislative branch (the Senate) confirming these nominations. The second step, involving the Senate, is necessary for several reasons.The most significant reason is the principle of checks and balances, which is a fundamental aspect of the U.S. Constitution. This principle is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. In the context of appointments, it means that the President cannot unilaterally fill public offices without the approval of the Senate.The options provided in the question allude to different aspects of this process:1. "Having a branch of Congress involved allows it to filibuster the confirmation process." This is true. The Senate can delay or block a nomination through filibuster, although this is relatively rare.2. "Having the Congress involved allows it to select its own appointee." This is not typically true. The President nominates individuals for positions, and the Senate confirms or rejects these nominations. The Senate does not usually select its own nominees.3. "Having a branch of Congress involved helps to balance the powers of the executive branch." This is the primary reason for the Senate's involvement. It provides a check on the executive branch's power.4. "Having the Congress involved gives the Supreme Court time to weigh in on the decision." This is not typically true. The Supreme Court does not usually weigh in on appointments unless there is a legal dispute.#AnswerHaving a branch of Congress involved helps to balance the powers of the executive branch.