Question
What is reasonable force in terms of self.defence? Choose the correct option and select Submit. The use of force only if you have been trained in self -defence No force is reasonable in terms of self.-defence The use of the same level of force with everyone The use of a level of force that is proportionate to the risk
Answer
4.1
(191 Votes)
Wyn
Master · Tutor for 5 years
Answer
D
Explanation
The phrase 'reasonable force' used in the context of self-defense typically is a challenging concept to strictly define, as the interpretation may vary based on jurisdiction. However, in usual legal contexts, reasonable force is deemed to be an acceptable level of force necessary to shield oneself or others from impending harm. The law explains 'reasonable' as not excessive or more than necessary. From the question and the given choices, we can deduce:1. The first statement: 'The use of force only if you have been trained in self-defence', is not entirely accurate or relevant to the definition of reasonable force.2. The second statement: 'No force is reasonable in terms of self-defence' is wrong since law permits the use of reasonable force as a form of self-defence.3. The third one, 'The use of the same level of force with everyone', may fail to strike the careful balance necessary for self-defence to never overshadow into a state of retaliation or offence. It denies reality that each scenario will require necessarily different forces.4. The fourth option: 'The use of a level of force that is proportionate to the risk' aligns best which what is known generally of 'reasonable force'. Legally, in pure forms, defence holds strong if and only if one ensures he/she does not use force exceeding the imminence of the perceived threat.