Question
Scenario 3 William Malloy was arrested for gambling in 1959 by the Hartford, Connecticut police. Malloy pled guilty, was sentenced to one year in jail, and fined 500 After 90 days, he was let out of jail and placed on two years probation. Sixteen months later.a Connecticut Superior Court ordered Malloy to testify about gambling and other criminal activities in Hartford County. When Malloy refused, on the grounds that it might incriminate him on other charges, he was put in jail and held there until he was willing to answer questions Malloy v. Hogan 5. What amendment is being discussed in this scenario? 6. Do you think that Malloy should have been put in jail for not testifying? Explain your answer.
Answer
4.3
(275 Votes)
Mitchell
Elite · Tutor for 8 years
Answer
5. The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution is being discussed in this scenario.6. Whether Malloy should have been put in jail for not testifying is a matter of interpretation and legal debate. Some argue that the Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination, and thus Malloy had the right to refuse to testify if he believed it could incriminate him. Others may argue that by refusing to testify, Malloy was obstructing justice and should face consequences. Ultimately, the decision would depend on the interpretation of the law and the specific circumstances of the case.