2) The First Amendment to the US Constitution says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Based on this, do you think Section 2 of the Sedition act is legal or illegal? Why?

Question

2) The First Amendment to the US Constitution says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Based on this, do you think Section 2 of the Sedition act is legal or illegal? Why?

Answer 1

Section 2 of the Sedition Act, which criminalizes making false statements that are critical of the government, would likely be considered illegal under the First Amendment. This is because it directly conflicts with the freedom of speech protected by the Constitution. The First Amendment prohibits Congress from passing laws that abridge freedom of speech, including criticism of the government. Therefore, any law, like Section 2 of the Sedition Act, that restricts speech critical of the government would likely be deemed unconstitutional.

Question

Answer

Answer