Confer with other managers locally to run the job fairs on a rota basis. The jobseekers may need to travel further but will still be able to attend a job fair every week if they wish. Counterproductive Ineffective Partially Effective Effective

## Step 1: Understand the contextThe question is asking about the effectiveness of a proposed strategy for organizing job fairs. The strategy involves coordinating with other local managers to host job fairs on a rotating basis. This approach aims to provide job seekers with a weekly opportunity to attend a job fair, albeit potentially requiring them to travel farther.## Step 2: Analyze the potential benefits### \textbf{Benefit 1:} By rotating the hosting responsibilities among local managers, job seekers will have access to at least one job fair every week. This regular availability of job fairs can be beneficial for job seekers who are actively seeking employment opportunities.### \textbf{Benefit 2:} With multiple managers organizing job fairs, the pool of participating employers is likely to be more diverse, as each manager may attract different companies to their respective events. This diversity can provide job seekers with a broader range of potential job opportunities.## Step 3: Analyze the potential drawbacks### \textbf{Drawback 1:} Job seekers may need to travel farther to attend job fairs hosted by managers in different locations. This can increase the time and cost associated with attending job fairs, potentially deterring some job seekers from participating.## Step 4: Evaluate the overall effectivenessWhile the proposed strategy ensures regular job fair opportunities and increased employer diversity, the potential drawback of increased travel distance for job seekers cannot be ignored. However, if the travel distances are reasonable and the benefits outweigh the costs for job seekers, the strategy can be considered partially effective.