I point Supreme Court decided that legislative apportionment was a question for state and federal courts to consider. Bakerv Carr C Reynolds v Sims Colgrove v Green Grayv Sanders

In Baker v. Carr (1962), the Supreme Court held that legislative apportionment was justiciable under the Equal Protection Clause, allowing federal courts to intervene in state legislative redistricting cases.Reynolds v. Sims (1964) established the "one person, one vote" principle, mandating that state legislative districts be roughly equal in population to ensure fair representation.Colgrove v. Green (1946) held that federal courts couldn't interfere in state legislative apportionment, leaving it solely to state legislatures unless a violation of specific constitutional provisions could be demonstrated.Gray v. Sanders (1963) declared that the "county unit" system in Georgia, which gave disproportionate voting power to rural areas, violated the Equal Protection Clause, thereby impacting the apportionment of representation.