Which explains a difference between an original case and appellate case that the Supreme Court hears? An original case has been heard by a lower court, while an appellate case has not. An original case involves the executive branch while an appellate case does not. An appellate case involves the legislative branch, while an original case does not. An appellate case has been heard by a lower court, while an original case has not.

Question

Which explains a difference between an original case and appellate case that the Supreme Court hears? An original case has been heard by a lower court, while an appellate case has not. An original case involves the executive branch while an appellate case does not. An appellate case involves the legislative branch, while an original case does not. An appellate case has been heard by a lower court, while an original case has not.

Answer 1

An appellate case has been heard by a lower court, while an original case has not.

Answer 2

An original case is one that is being heard for the first time, typically by trial courts. These courts determine the facts and apply the law to reach a decision. In contrast, an appellate case is one where the decision by a lower court (such as a trial court) is being reviewed. Appellate cases involve appeals from lower courts and focus on whether there were errors in the application of the law during the original trial. Importantly, appellate courts do not re-try cases or hear new evidence; they review the record of the lower court’s proceedings.

Question

Answer

Answer

Explanation