Question
D 3. Investigators believe Chris is an experienced white collar criminal who removed a signature with chemicals then forged it. What type of evidence is this? erasure evidence addition evidence obliteration evidence burning evidence
Answer
4.7
(380 Votes)
Edward
Professional · Tutor for 6 years
Answer
C. obliteration evidence
Explanation
This question is about categorizing evidence in the field of crime investigation. The context suggests that Chris, an alleged white collar criminal, is believed to have used a chemical to erase a signature and then adopted forgery, leaving behind some form of trace or evidence.The type of evidence would be defined based upon how the material alteration is accomplished."Erasure evidence" refers to instances where information has been physically rubbed or scraped off, generally leading to some disruption to the surrounding areas."Addition evidence" would involve adding certain elements or compounds to smear or cover something that was previously present."Obliteration evidence" refers to when a piece of information is rendered unreadable or eliminated, often via blotting out or wiping off rather than destroying it completely."Burning evidence" refers to attempts to eradicate evidence by setting it on fire.Among the given options, an action of removing a signature with chemicals and then overwriting (forging it) would be best characterized as obliteration evidence, as the initial information or signature was intended to be obliterated and overwritten.