Question
What definition best describes reasonable force. [LO9] The use of force as a punishment. Using force once the danger has acceptably reduced. Force that is deemed proportionate and necessary. Using force to subdue a person for a s long as possible.
Answer
4.2
(164 Votes)
Lexi
Expert · Tutor for 3 years
Answer
Force that is deemed proportionate and necessary.
Explanation
## Step 1: Understanding the problem statement, particularly what counts as "reasonable force". The possible choices for the definition include - "The use of force as a punishment", "Using force once the danger has acceptably reduced", "Force that is deemed proportionate and necessary", and "Using force to subdue a person for a long wan as possible".## Step 2: Definition elimination. The first choice "The use of force as a punishment" would not be categorized as reasonable or legal. Force purely as a method of punishment without connection to immediate danger or threat isn't reasonable. ## Step 3: The second choice "Using force once the danger has acceptably reduced" is not entirely correct either. Using force shouldn't occur upon lowering levels of danger to an acceptably reduced level but right after the beginning of a clear, tangible threat where immediate health risks are possible. ## Step 4: Next is the third choice "Force that is deemed proportionate and necessary" speaks volumes about the term 'reasonable force'. The force used should be reasonably proportioned to yield necessary and immediate threat-block response, not to extract a level of pain or punish individuals. ## Step 5: The last choice "Using force to subdue a person for as long as possible" has serious human rights complications, therefore it doesn't qualify as reasonable force.