Consider this claim: The federal government should protect national parks by limiting the number of visitors allowed. Which is the strongest evidence to support the claim? One recent visitor to a national park posted the following review on a popular website: "The experience was disturbing. It was like going to an amusement park: long lines, tons of traffic, trash strewn everywhere." In recent years, the National Park,Service has reported a backlog of underfunded projects due to aging infrastructure, budget restraints, and staffing shortages. Staff at Yosemite National Park report that an increase in visitors has led to problems such as smog and trail erosion.

Question

Consider this claim: The federal government should protect national parks by limiting the number of visitors allowed. Which is the strongest evidence to support the claim? One recent visitor to a national park posted the following review on a popular website: "The experience was disturbing. It was like going to an amusement park: long lines, tons of traffic, trash strewn everywhere." In recent years, the National Park,Service has reported a backlog of underfunded projects due to aging infrastructure, budget restraints, and staffing shortages. Staff at Yosemite National Park report that an increase in visitors has led to problems such as smog and trail erosion.

Answer 1

The strongest evidence to support the claim that the federal government should protect national parks by limiting the number of visitors allowed is:"Staff at Yosemite National Park report that an increase in visitors has led to problems such as smog and trail erosion."This evidence directly links the increase in visitors to negative environmental impacts, such as smog and trail erosion, highlighting the need for measures to mitigate these issues, which could include limiting visitor numbers.

Question

Answer

Answer