Question
1. A torn T-shirt was found in the back seat of a suspect's car. Two pieces of torn cloth were found at the scene of the crime. Can the two pieces be individualized to the T-shirt? Explain. 2. Would small glass fragments be considered class evidence or individual evidence that can be unquely associated with a broken Explain. 3. A large piece of broken bottle was found at the scene of the crime. Part of a broken bottle was found with a suspect.Can the top be uniquely associated with (ndividualized with the bottom? Explain. 4. A note was found at a crime scene at a bank.A notepad with a similar type of paper was found in the desk of a suspect. Can the note be traced to the pad? Explain. Can the handwriting be associated to a person? Can fingerprints on the note be individualized to a person? 5. A soda can was found at the scene of a crime. Inve Investigators tried to determine whether any of the several tabs found in a suspect's garage could be uniquely associated (individualized) with the can. How would this be possible? Explain
Answer
4.2
(303 Votes)
Warren
Professional · Tutor for 6 years
Answer
1. Yes, the two pieces of torn cloth found at the scene of the crime can be individualized to the torn T-shirt found in the suspect's car through a process of physical matching. By comparing the torn edges of the cloth pieces with those of the T-shirt, forensic experts can assess if they align perfectly in terms of texture, color, and other physical characteristics, thus establishing a probable link between the pieces and the T-shirt.2. Small glass fragments would typically be considered class evidence rather than individual evidence that can be uniquely associated with a specific broken bottle. While the fragments may share characteristics such as color or composition with the original bottle, they are not typically unique enough to definitively link them to a specific bottle without additional supporting evidence.3. It is possible to uniquely associate the top of a broken bottle with the bottom if the two pieces fit together in a manner that establishes a continuous break pattern, similar to solving a puzzle. This would require a precise alignment of the fractured edges and matching of physical characteristics such as glass composition and fracture patterns. If the top and bottom pieces fit together seamlessly and exhibit matching features, it can be inferred that they originated from the same bottle.4. The note found at the crime scene can potentially be traced to the notepad found in the suspect's desk through various means. Forensic analysis may include comparing the paper type, watermark patterns, or indentations from previous writing. Handwriting analysis can help determine if the writing style matches that of the suspect, although this is subject to interpretation and expert assessment. Fingerprints on the note can also be analyzed to determine if they match those of the suspect, providing additional evidence linking them to the crime.5. Investigators can attempt to uniquely associate the soda can found at the crime scene with one of the tabs found in the suspect's garage through a process of toolmark analysis. By examining the unique impressions left on the tabs during their manufacture, such as marks or irregularities, forensic experts can compare these features with corresponding impressions on the can's opening mechanism. If there is a match in the toolmarks, it can indicate a probable association between the tab and the can, providing valuable forensic evidence.