Thinking Like a Political Scientist Reasoning Process Comparison List at least two categories of comparison that could be used to compare the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1. Political Science Disciplinary Practices Source Analysis Brutus raised concerns about the elements of the Constitution that proposed moving from a confederation to a federal system. Evaluate the proposed the author used to support these concerns. How well does it used to support these concerns, How woldoesit __

Question

Thinking Like a Political Scientist Reasoning Process Comparison List at least two categories of comparison that could be used to compare the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1. Political Science Disciplinary Practices Source Analysis Brutus raised concerns about the elements of the Constitution that proposed moving from a confederation to a federal system. Evaluate the proposed the author used to support these concerns. How well does it used to support these concerns, How woldoesit __

Answer 1

1. Categories of Comparison: - Views on the size and scope of the republic - Nature and effectiveness of representation2. Evaluation of Brutus's Concerns: Brutus argued that a large republic would be unmanageable and that representatives would be detached from the people. He used historical examples and logical reasoning to support his concerns. These arguments were well-founded but lacked empirical evidence.

Answer 2

The question involves comparing arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1 and evaluating the arguments used by Brutus. Federalist No. 10 discusses the dangers of factions and advocates for a large republic, while Brutus No. 1 argues against a strong central government. Categories of comparison could include views on the size of the republic and the nature of representation.

Question

Answer

Answer

Explanation