Home
/
Law
/
Question 1-11 Which generalization is consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v.United States? The freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are virtually unlimited Government has the right to suspend any rights at any time. Individual rights can be limited in the national interest The balance between individual rights and the general social welfare almost always favors individual rights.

Question

Question 1-11
Which generalization is consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v.United States?
The freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are virtually unlimited
Government has the right to suspend any rights at any time.
Individual rights can be limited in the national interest
The balance between individual rights and the general social welfare almost always favors individual rights.

Question 1-11 Which generalization is consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v.United States? The freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are virtually unlimited Government has the right to suspend any rights at any time. Individual rights can be limited in the national interest The balance between individual rights and the general social welfare almost always favors individual rights.

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.5221 Voting
avatar
BetsyAdvanced · Tutor for 1 years

Answer

The generalization consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States is: "Individual rights can be limited in the national interest."
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x