Home
/
History
/
so "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. __ The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight,and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right." Majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States, 1919 The restrictions imposed by the Schenck decision most directly contradicted which of the following earlier developments in the United States? Assertion of federal power over states' rights in the 1819 McCulloch v.Maryland decision Expansion of voting rights during President Andrew Jackson's administration Arguments for self-government asserted in the Declaration of Independence Protection of liberties through the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791 3 points

Question

so
"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. __ The question in
every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they
will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many
things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight,and that no
Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right."
Majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States, 1919
The restrictions imposed by the Schenck decision most directly contradicted which of the following earlier developments in the United States?
Assertion of federal power over states' rights in the 1819 McCulloch v.Maryland decision
Expansion of voting rights during President Andrew Jackson's administration
Arguments for self-government asserted in the Declaration of Independence
Protection of liberties through the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791
3 points

so "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. __ The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight,and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right." Majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Schenck v. United States, 1919 The restrictions imposed by the Schenck decision most directly contradicted which of the following earlier developments in the United States? Assertion of federal power over states' rights in the 1819 McCulloch v.Maryland decision Expansion of voting rights during President Andrew Jackson's administration Arguments for self-government asserted in the Declaration of Independence Protection of liberties through the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791 3 points

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.4254 Voting
avatar
AshtonVeteran · Tutor for 11 years

Answer

The restrictions imposed by the Schenck decision most directly contradicted the protection of liberties through the adoption of the Bill of Rights in 1791.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x