Home
/
Law
/
B. Supreme Court Summary. Using the word bank, help summarize the Supreme Court's decision-making process in this fictitious case. (Hint: Not every term will be used, but no term will be used more than oncel) & & & & & appellate jurisdiction & dissenting opinion & & precedent & legal brief & & respondent & concurring opinion majority opinion & oral arguments & petition for a writ of certiorarl Orville was arrested for protesting on a public sidewalk about the need to stop global warming. His lawyer argued that the arrest was unconstitutional because the First Amendment gives Orville the right to speak freely and petition the government. A jury found Orville guilty and sentenced him to twenty years in prison. The appeals court affirmed (agreed with) the jury's decision. Orville's attorneys filed a with the Supreme Court, asking them to hear Orville's case under its authority. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, beginning its process. As attorneys for the Orville's attorneys had to file their first. STOP GLOBAL At the Orville's attorneys argued WARMING forcefully that Orville's rights had been violated and the Supreme Court justices asked many questions. After discussing the case in a conference, the Supreme Court decided unanimously that Orville's First Amendment rights had been violated. Later that month, the Supreme Court issued its overturning the lower court decisions and setting Orville free!

Question

B. Supreme Court Summary. Using the word bank, help summarize the Supreme Court's decision-making process in this fictitious case. (Hint: Not every term will be used, but no term will be used more than oncel)

 & & & 
 & & appellate jurisdiction & dissenting opinion 
 & & precedent & legal brief 
 & & respondent & concurring opinion 
 majority opinion & oral arguments & petition for a writ of certiorarl 


Orville was arrested for protesting on a public sidewalk about the need to stop global warming. His lawyer argued that the arrest was unconstitutional because the First Amendment gives Orville the right to speak freely and petition the government. A jury found Orville guilty and sentenced him to twenty years in prison. The appeals court affirmed (agreed with) the jury's decision. Orville's attorneys filed a with the Supreme Court, asking them to hear Orville's case under its authority. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, beginning its process. As attorneys for the
Orville's attorneys had to file their first.
STOP GLOBAL
At the Orville's attorneys argued
WARMING forcefully that Orville's rights had been violated and the Supreme Court
justices asked many questions. After discussing the case in a conference, the Supreme Court decided unanimously that Orville's First Amendment rights had been violated. Later that month, the Supreme Court issued its overturning the lower court decisions and setting Orville free!

B. Supreme Court Summary. Using the word bank, help summarize the Supreme Court's decision-making process in this fictitious case. (Hint: Not every term will be used, but no term will be used more than oncel) & & & & & appellate jurisdiction & dissenting opinion & & precedent & legal brief & & respondent & concurring opinion majority opinion & oral arguments & petition for a writ of certiorarl Orville was arrested for protesting on a public sidewalk about the need to stop global warming. His lawyer argued that the arrest was unconstitutional because the First Amendment gives Orville the right to speak freely and petition the government. A jury found Orville guilty and sentenced him to twenty years in prison. The appeals court affirmed (agreed with) the jury's decision. Orville's attorneys filed a with the Supreme Court, asking them to hear Orville's case under its authority. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, beginning its process. As attorneys for the Orville's attorneys had to file their first. STOP GLOBAL At the Orville's attorneys argued WARMING forcefully that Orville's rights had been violated and the Supreme Court justices asked many questions. After discussing the case in a conference, the Supreme Court decided unanimously that Orville's First Amendment rights had been violated. Later that month, the Supreme Court issued its overturning the lower court decisions and setting Orville free!

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.3214 Voting
avatar
PenelopeVeteran · Tutor for 12 years

Answer

Orville, arrested for protesting on a public sidewalk, claimed his First Amendment rights were violated. Found guilty, he appealed, and the appeals court affirmed the decision. Orville's attorneys filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. Orville's legal brief argued his rights were violated, supported by oral arguments. The Supreme Court, in plenary review, unanimously held that Orville's First Amendment rights were violated. The majority opinion overturned lower court decisions, setting Orville free. No dissenting or concurring opinions were issued, and no precedent was cited.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x