7. How does Dr.King develop h]s claim that "one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws"? Explain the evidence he provides and evaluate how this evidence supports his arguments. square

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. develops his claim that "one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws" through a combination of moral, ethical, and historical reasoning. He argues that unjust laws violate fundamental human rights and principles. King draws on several key pieces of evidence to support his position:1. **Appeal to Moral Law:** King asserts that there is a higher moral law that transcends man-made laws. He refers to the concept of natural law or divine law, suggesting that human laws should align with these higher moral principles.2. **Historical Examples:** King provides historical examples, such as the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany or the resistance against colonial laws, to illustrate that blindly following legal statutes without considering their moral implications can lead to injustice and oppression.3. **Constitutional Rights:** King points to constitutional rights and democratic principles as a basis for challenging unjust laws. He argues that these legal frameworks are meant to protect the inherent rights of individuals, and any law contradicting these principles is morally wrong.4. **Nonviolent Civil Disobedience:** King advocates for nonviolent civil disobedience as a means to address unjust laws. He argues that breaking an unjust law peacefully and willingly accepting the consequences can expose the moral flaws in the legal system and prompt societal change.Evaluation:- **Logical Consistency:** King's argument is logically consistent, weaving together moral, historical, and legal aspects to build a comprehensive case against unjust laws.- **Persuasiveness:** The use of historical examples and appeals to fundamental principles enhances the persuasiveness of King's argument, making it relatable and compelling.- **Nonviolent Approach:** King's emphasis on nonviolent civil disobedience demonstrates a commitment to moral principles and strengthens his case by offering a peaceful alternative to challenging unjust laws.In summary, Dr. King effectively develops his claim by appealing to moral law, providing historical context, emphasizing constitutional rights, and advocating for nonviolent civil disobedience. This evidence collectively supports his argument that individuals have a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.