Home
/
Law
/
Question 3 of 10 Read this excerpt from the dissent on Tinker v.. Des Moines. While the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the Court's statement that the few armband students did not actually "disrupt" the classwork, I think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would In terms of Supreme Court language and protocol, what is this excerpt an example of? A. A precedent B. A majority opinion C. A judicial review D. A summary

Question

Question 3 of 10
Read this excerpt from the dissent on Tinker v.. Des Moines.
While the absence of obscene
remarks or boisterous and
loud disorder perhaps justifies the
Court's statement that
the few armband students did not actually "disrupt" the
classwork, I think the record overwhelmingly shows that
the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials
and principals foresaw they would
In terms of Supreme Court language and protocol, what is this excerpt an
example of?
A. A precedent
B. A majority opinion
C. A judicial review
D. A summary

Question 3 of 10 Read this excerpt from the dissent on Tinker v.. Des Moines. While the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the Court's statement that the few armband students did not actually "disrupt" the classwork, I think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would In terms of Supreme Court language and protocol, what is this excerpt an example of? A. A precedent B. A majority opinion C. A judicial review D. A summary

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.1187 Voting
avatar
ZeldaMaster · Tutor for 5 years

Answer

C. A judicial review
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x