Source 3 Speech at London Polytechnic Emmeline Pankhurst, June 24,1915 Emmeline Pankhurst, with her daughter Christabel, was a leader in the British women's suffragist movement. She was arrested more than a dozen times as a result of various protests. When Britain declared war in 1914, she suspended her suffragist campaign and focused instead on how women could help the war effort. Women are eating their hearts out with desire to see their services utilised in this national emergency. It is not a question with us of war bonuses; it is not a question of red tape, which has to be slowly untied. With us it is not a question of these things; but we realise that if the war is to be won,the whole energy of the nation and the whole capacity of the nation will have to be utilised in order to win. How is it that men can be so behind as not to see that the fire of patriotism burns in the hearts of women quite as strongly as it does in the hearts of men[?]. I am one of those people who, at the right time and in the proper place,are prepared to fight for certain ideals of freedom and liberty and would be willing to give my life for them; we are prepared to hold great organising meetings all over the country and enlist women for war service if they will only set us free to do it. We here and now this afternoon offer our services to the Government, to recruit and enlist the women of the country for war service, whether that war service is the making of munitions or whether that war service is the replacing of skilled men who have been called up, so that the business of the country can go on. 1. What does this excerpt suggest about women's stance on fighting the Great War? 2. Why would this attitude be surprising to some people at the time? 3.How is this perspective reflected in warfare today?

Question

Question

Source 3 Speech at London Polytechnic Emmeline Pankhurst, June 24,1915 Emmeline Pankhurst, with her daughter Christabel, was a leader in the British women's suffragist movement. She was arrested more than a dozen times as a result of various protests. When Britain declared war in 1914, she suspended her suffragist campaign and focused instead on how women could help the war effort. Women are eating their hearts out with desire to see their services utilised in this national emergency. It is not a question with us of war bonuses; it is not a question of red tape, which has to be slowly untied. With us it is not a question of these things; but we realise that if the war is to be won,the whole energy of the nation and the whole capacity of the nation will have to be utilised in order to win. How is it that men can be so behind as not to see that the fire of patriotism burns in the hearts of women quite as strongly as it does in the hearts of men[?]. I am one of those people who, at the right time and in the proper place,are prepared to fight for certain ideals of freedom and liberty and would be willing to give my life for them; we are prepared to hold great organising meetings all over the country and enlist women for war service if they will only set us free to do it. We here and now this afternoon offer our services to the Government, to recruit and enlist the women of the country for war service, whether that war service is the making of munitions or whether that war service is the replacing of skilled men who have been called up, so that the business of the country can go on. 1. What does this excerpt suggest about women's stance on fighting the Great War? 2. Why would this attitude be surprising to some people at the time? 3.How is this perspective reflected in warfare today?

Answer 1

1. The excerpt suggests that women, represented by Emmeline Pankhurst, were eager and willing to contribute to the Great War. Despite their historical struggle for suffrage, they temporarily set aside their campaign and offered their services to the government for the war effort. The focus is on the shared patriotism and willingness of women to actively participate in various capacities, such as making munitions or replacing skilled men.2. This attitude would be surprising to some people at the time because it challenged traditional gender roles. In the early 20th century, societal norms dictated that women's primary roles were in the domestic sphere, and their involvement in warfare or political matters was limited. The willingness of women to step outside these traditional roles and actively engage in the war effort went against prevailing gender expectations, making it a surprising and unconventional stance.3. This perspective is reflected in warfare today through the ongoing push for gender equality and the integration of women into various military roles. Modern armed forces increasingly recognize and value the contributions of women in combat, intelligence, logistics, and other essential roles. The idea that the entire nation's energy and capacity must be utilized to win a war, as emphasized by Pankhurst, aligns with contemporary efforts to ensure equal opportunities and representation for both men and women in military service.

Question

Answer

Answer

Hot Questions