Home
/
Social Science
/
23 In this passage , Senator Smith argues that those who question an individual's loyalty to the United States should be reminded that (1) the loss of one's job and reputation because of a rumor can be justified (2) the rights of accused persons are safeguarded by the Constitution (3)Americans have the right to their own opinions, even if those opinions are unpopular (4) freedom of speech is not absolute and may be limited in a national emergency 2

Question

23 In this passage , Senator Smith argues that those
who question an individual's loyalty to the United
States should be reminded that
(1) the loss of one's job and reputation because of
a rumor can be justified
(2) the rights of accused persons are safeguarded
by the Constitution
(3)Americans have the right to their own opinions,
even if those opinions are unpopular
(4) freedom of speech is not absolute and may be
limited in a national emergency
2

23 In this passage , Senator Smith argues that those who question an individual's loyalty to the United States should be reminded that (1) the loss of one's job and reputation because of a rumor can be justified (2) the rights of accused persons are safeguarded by the Constitution (3)Americans have the right to their own opinions, even if those opinions are unpopular (4) freedom of speech is not absolute and may be limited in a national emergency 2

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.7292 Voting
avatar
RileyProfessional · Tutor for 6 years

Answer

(2) the rights of accused persons are safeguarded by the Constitution

Explain

Senator Smith's argument emphasizes the importance of constitutional protections, particularly the rights of accused individuals. This suggests that questioning someone's loyalty should be approached with caution and respect for legal safeguards.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x