Home
/
Law
/
Alejandro is writing an arguméntative essay about corporate advertising in public schools Which evidence best supports Alejandro's claim that corporate advertising in public schools would be an unfair practice? Students are more likely to buy and use products and services from the advertisement that is most appealing to them; if they are exposed to these at their school, they will not buy anything they see outside the school. Statistics show that children aged 13-19 view advertisements more than any other age group which means that their purchasing power will increase if they are exposed to more advertisements while attending school. Most school-aged children are unable to buy the products that would be advertised in their schools;therefore, using such ads would distract students from their school work by shifting their focus to consumer products. A study conducted by a mass communication journal shows that children lack the experience and knowledge to evaluate the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals making students particularly vulnerable targets.

Question

Alejandro is writing an arguméntative essay about corporate advertising in public schools Which evidence best supports Alejandro's
claim that corporate advertising in public schools would be an unfair practice?
Students are more likely to buy and use products and services from the advertisement that is most appealing to
them; if they are exposed to these at their school, they will not buy anything they see outside the school.
Statistics show that children aged 13-19 view advertisements more than any other age group which means that
their purchasing power will increase if they are exposed to more advertisements while attending school.
Most school-aged children are unable to buy the products that would be advertised in their schools;therefore, using
such ads would distract students from their school work by shifting their focus to consumer products.
A study conducted by a mass communication journal shows that children lack the experience and knowledge to
evaluate the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals making students particularly vulnerable targets.

Alejandro is writing an arguméntative essay about corporate advertising in public schools Which evidence best supports Alejandro's claim that corporate advertising in public schools would be an unfair practice? Students are more likely to buy and use products and services from the advertisement that is most appealing to them; if they are exposed to these at their school, they will not buy anything they see outside the school. Statistics show that children aged 13-19 view advertisements more than any other age group which means that their purchasing power will increase if they are exposed to more advertisements while attending school. Most school-aged children are unable to buy the products that would be advertised in their schools;therefore, using such ads would distract students from their school work by shifting their focus to consumer products. A study conducted by a mass communication journal shows that children lack the experience and knowledge to evaluate the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals making students particularly vulnerable targets.

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.5317 Voting
avatar
ArthurExpert · Tutor for 3 years

Answer

The evidence that best supports Alejandro's claim that corporate advertising in public schools would be an unfair practice is: "A study conducted by a mass communication journal shows that children lack the experience and knowledge to evaluate the purpose of the persuasive advertising appeals, making students particularly vulnerable targets."
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x