Home
/
Law
/
The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War The school district suspended the students , possibly violating their right to free speech. Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion? A. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment rights. B. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional C. The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students. D. There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption.

Question

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who
wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War The school
district suspended the students , possibly violating their right to free speech.
Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?
A. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit
was actually a question of Second Amendment rights.
B. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear
controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional
C. The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the
school to suspend the students.
D. There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when
they anticipate a disruption.

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War The school district suspended the students , possibly violating their right to free speech. Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion? A. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment rights. B. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional C. The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students. D. There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption.

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.3351 Voting
avatar
DouglasMaster · Tutor for 5 years

Answer

Let's analyze the options provided to determine which one best summarizes the dissenting opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case.Option A suggests that the case was about Second Amendment rights, which is incorrect. The Second Amendment concerns the right to bear arms, not freedom of speech.Option B implies that the suspension was unconstitutional because other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols. This statement does not reflect the dissenting opinion, which would argue in favor of the school's decision, not against it.Option C states that the Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school. This is not a summary of the dissenting opinion; it is a statement about a ruling, which is not relevant to the question asked.Option D mentions that there is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption. This aligns with the dissenting opinion in the Tinker case, which held that the school could limit students' freedom of speech if it could reasonably forecast that the speech would cause a disruption in the school environment.**Answer**: D. There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption. This option best summarizes the dissenting opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines case, which held that the school's anticipation of disruption justified the limitation of the students' free speech rights.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x