Now that you have watched the video, review the four responses below and decide for each one, whether it is "More" effective or "Less"effective in this situation. Continue to explain your ideas in the same way in future as you haven't had the same issue with other colleagues E Tell your colleague that you think your idea will work well and start to put the items in the neighbouring department. Adjust how you explain your ideas to this colleague in future to see if this helps with coming to an agreement. Try to understand why your colleague doesn't like your idea so you can work together to come up with an alternative

Question

Question

Now that you have watched the video, review the four responses below and decide for each one, whether it is "More" effective or "Less"effective in this situation. Continue to explain your ideas in the same way in future as you haven't had the same issue with other colleagues E Tell your colleague that you think your idea will work well and start to put the items in the neighbouring department. Adjust how you explain your ideas to this colleague in future to see if this helps with coming to an agreement. Try to understand why your colleague doesn't like your idea so you can work together to come up with an alternative

Answer 1

More effective: 1. Continue to explain your ideas in the same way in future as you haven't had the same issue with other colleagues. 3. Adjust how you explain your ideas to this colleague in future to see if this helps with coming to an agreement. 4. Try to understand why your colleague doesn't like your idea so you can work together to come up with an alternative. Less effective: 2. Tell your colleague that you think your idea will work well and start to put the items in the neighbouring department.

Answer 2

## Step 1: This question follows the same organisational context as the example problem provided. The situation lnvolves suggesting a solution or idea at a common platform and dealing with skeptical co-workers or colleagues. ## Step 2: The question presents 4 given responses and asks to gauge each on whether it's 'More' effective or 'Less' effective under these circumstances. The decision is marked based on how professionalism, integrity, empathy, mutual advantage are instilled in each response. * **Response 1 (More/Less Effective ?: More)**: This approach continues the explanation in a similar way as before considering feedback from only a single colleague. Past interactions with several other colleagues without objection can validate using the same method to express thoughts. However, over-generalisations and hence ignoring individual differences may lead to difficulties. * **Response 2 (More/Less Effective ?: Less)**: Asserting an idea to be plausible without much evidential backup or chassis and instantly putting it into action without collegial agreement seems to be unprofessional and aggressive. The colleague's stance or impairment isn't taken into consideration here which may damage the communication process eventually leading to unconstructive work surroundings. * **Response 3 (More/Less Effective ?: More)**: The act of altering the disclosure stylesystem keeping in mind individual variations and tendencies shows intellect and helps foster healthier relationships fostering improved mutual understanding. Trying different ways of expression provides better prospect to finding something that clicks for a specific colleague. It shows respect and inclusivity for everybody's viewpoint on average. * **Response 4 (More/Less Effective ?: More)**: Figuring out precisely why an ally disagrees with your statement yields a wide range of insights. Using this method, improvements can be made and any problems can be identified. Working together on an alternative solution can bring forward-rooted results targeting the mutual interest of both. This proactive strategy contributes authoritatively to a flourishing effervescent communication and considerably smoother workflow overall.

Question

Answer

Answer

Explain

Hot Questions