Home
/
Law
/
Which of the following can be described as an unreasonable distinction under the Privileges and Immunities Clause? a Anout-of-state resident must pay higher tultion for an in-state public university In-state workers are hired before out-of state employees c Apolitician cannot run for office unless he or she lived in the State for a full year d In-state residents must pay taxes to raise money for the management of State game lands

Question

Which of the following can be described as an unreasonable distinction under the Privileges and Immunities Clause?
a Anout-of-state resident must pay higher tultion for an in-state public university
In-state workers are hired before out-of state employees
c Apolitician cannot run for office unless he or she lived in the State for a full year
d In-state residents must pay taxes to raise money for the management of State game lands

Which of the following can be described as an unreasonable distinction under the Privileges and Immunities Clause? a Anout-of-state resident must pay higher tultion for an in-state public university In-state workers are hired before out-of state employees c Apolitician cannot run for office unless he or she lived in the State for a full year d In-state residents must pay taxes to raise money for the management of State game lands

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.0208 Voting
avatar
WinstonProfessional · Tutor for 6 years

Answer

<p> b</p>

Explain

<p> The Privileges and Immunities Clause in the U.S. constitution is designed to prevent a state from treating citizens of other states in a discriminatory manner. However, there are certain exceptions where it is deemed constitutional for a state to differentiate its treatment between its residents/citizens and those coming from out-of-state. Taking into account the options provided, a number of them reflect degrees of differential treatment without necessarily being viewed as violative of the principle 'derived from the clause': <br /><br />a. It is generally understood that public universities may charge higher tuition for out-of-state residents. This is because in-state residents' (or their parents') taxes already go towards subsidizing the costs of the university, so it is fair for out-of-state residents to be expected to bridge the shortfall.<br />b. In-state workers being hired before out-of-state employees might fall into an ethical gray area but it's not an unreasonable differentiation of treatment.<br />c. A politician cannot run for office unless he or she lived in the State for a full year. This condition mandates residency rather than being directly related to citizenship per se, hence it does not contravene the clause as it applies to any individual pondering a run for office, irrespective of their actual state of origin.<br />d. In-state residents must pay taxes to raise money for the management of State game lands. Again, this involves a concern that has much to do with residency, given that benefits conferred by such (environmental stances) directly impact the local community, inclusive of those who've migrated.<br /><br />The question requires a variant that reasonably breached the clause.<br /></p>
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x