Home
/
Law
/
Applications seeking authorisation to deprive liberty should be: A. Via the urgent option rather than the standard option B. Reasonably anticipated in advance C. Sought when a new client's service begins, just in case they lack capacity D. Dealt with as late as possible in case such action is not required

Question

Applications seeking authorisation to
deprive liberty should be:
A. Via the urgent option rather than the
standard option
B. Reasonably anticipated in advance
C. Sought when a new client's service
begins, just in case they lack capacity
D. Dealt with as late as possible in case
such action is not required

Applications seeking authorisation to deprive liberty should be: A. Via the urgent option rather than the standard option B. Reasonably anticipated in advance C. Sought when a new client's service begins, just in case they lack capacity D. Dealt with as late as possible in case such action is not required

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.1202 Voting
avatar
GretaVeteran · Tutor for 12 years

Answer

<p> B</p>

Explain

<p> These options present various scenarios regarding the circumstances under which authorisation for deprivation of liberty may be sought. Option A suggests using the urgent pathway rather than the standard method, but this might be inappropriate if the situation doesn't demand rapid action. Option B involves reasonable anticipation, meaning situations where deprivation of liberty is foreseeably required, a circumstance preferable to an emergency action. Option C involves seeking authorisation when a new client begins service, implying a prejudgment about the client's capacity turns up, which is neither fair nor lawful. Basically, you can't deprive somebody's liberty on the preconception they might lack capacity in the future. Option D advises delaying action as much as possible, contradicting principles of protection and prevention underpinning deprivation of liberty as a legal step. </p>
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x