Home
/
Law
/
A district nurse visits a patient in their home who is under the influence of alcohol. The nurse is standing by the front door, which is open . The patient, who is in the lounge, threatens her. She moves forward , strikes the patient and runs out of the front door. Would this be defined as reasonable force within the law? correct option and select Submit. Yes No Submit

Question

A district nurse visits a patient in their home who is under the influence of alcohol. The nurse is standing by the front
door, which is open . The patient, who is in the lounge, threatens her. She moves forward , strikes the patient and
runs out of the front door. Would this be defined as reasonable force within the law?
correct option and select Submit.
Yes
No
Submit

A district nurse visits a patient in their home who is under the influence of alcohol. The nurse is standing by the front door, which is open . The patient, who is in the lounge, threatens her. She moves forward , strikes the patient and runs out of the front door. Would this be defined as reasonable force within the law? correct option and select Submit. Yes No Submit

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.5311 Voting
avatar
MarvinElite · Tutor for 8 years

Answer

<p> No</p>

Explain

<p> The use of reasonable force is a concept that exists within the larger sphere of lawful actions, maintaining a foothold during initiatives of self-defence. The reasonable force sentiment promotes the idea of reacting to systematically immediate threats by using proportionate force as necessary to ensure safety. It offers people the confidence to expect legally protected in moments where their lives are continuously and threatened, threatened or implicitly threatened. This principle doesn't authorize instigating severe settlements because someone has offended or transgressed upon an individual, reciprocity engaged upon has to be instantly reactive and in strict relativity with proportionately levelled danger. It also doesn't condone exaggerated actions performed under the actual threat itself. In the particular incident here, the patient articulated intends to pose threat, and realization of the slightly credible danger initiated plaintiff's self-defence response champions her actions but the deterministic prosecution preservation deciphers and her forced action was wilful, then it isn't reasonable. Only academic investigations and legal requisites' deliberation installations are made that facilitate an array of determinations to determine whether the strike was moment worthy protection-dependent unauthorized inappropriate perk. </p>
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x