Home
/
History
/
Based on their decision to go fishing beyond the lines of safety and their conversation about war, what can you infer about the two friends? They are ignorant of the risk they are taking, as they are oblivious to the dangers of the war. They underestimate the danger of the Prussians due to their sense of French superiority. They are aware of the risk they are taking but feel that the enjoyment is worth it. They have combat experience and believe they are prepared to defend themselves in case of attack.

Question

Based on their decision to go fishing beyond the lines of safety and their conversation
about war, what can you infer about the two friends?
They are ignorant of the risk they are taking, as they are oblivious to the dangers of the war.
They underestimate the danger of the Prussians due to their sense of French superiority.
They are aware of the risk they are taking but feel that the enjoyment is worth it.
They have combat experience and believe they are prepared to defend themselves in case of
attack.

Based on their decision to go fishing beyond the lines of safety and their conversation about war, what can you infer about the two friends? They are ignorant of the risk they are taking, as they are oblivious to the dangers of the war. They underestimate the danger of the Prussians due to their sense of French superiority. They are aware of the risk they are taking but feel that the enjoyment is worth it. They have combat experience and believe they are prepared to defend themselves in case of attack.

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.6367 Voting
avatar
DonovanMaster · Tutor for 5 years

Answer

They are aware of the risk they are taking but feel that the enjoyment is worth it.

Explain

The question is a multiple-choice type, focusing on the inference about the two friends based on their actions and conversation. The correct inference should align with their awareness of risk and their attitude towards the danger.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x