Home
/
Literature
/
(This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.) In the nineteenth and most of the twentieth centuries, handwriting instruction (print and cursive)was virtually universal in schools in the United States. By contrast, little if any time is devoted to such lessons today universal in that handwriting instruction should still have a place in schooling, others maintain that digital technologies have rendered such instruction unnecessary. Carefully read the following six sources, including the introductory information for each source. Write an essay that synthesizes material from at least three of the sources and develops your position on the place, if any. of handwriting instruction in today's schools. Source A (Gillis) Source B (worksheet) Source C (Trubck) Source D (Kysilko) Source E (Pot) Source F (graph) In your response you should do the following: - Respond to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position. - Select and use evidence from at least three of the provided sources to support your line of reasoning. Indicate clearly the sources used through direct quotation,paraphrase, or summary.Sources may be cited as Source A Source B, etc., or by using the description in parentheses. - Explain how the evidence supports your line of reasoning. - Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your argument.

Question

(This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.)
In the nineteenth and most of the twentieth centuries, handwriting instruction (print and cursive)was virtually
universal in schools in the United States. By contrast, little if any time is devoted to such lessons today
universal in that handwriting instruction should still have a place in schooling, others maintain that digital
technologies have rendered such instruction unnecessary.
Carefully read the following six sources, including the introductory information for each source. Write an
essay that synthesizes material from at least three of the sources and develops your position on the place, if any.
of handwriting instruction in today's schools.
Source A (Gillis)
Source B (worksheet)
Source C (Trubck)
Source D (Kysilko)
Source E (Pot)
Source F (graph)
In your response you should do the following:
- Respond to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position.
- Select and use evidence from at least three of the provided sources to support your line of reasoning.
Indicate clearly the sources used through direct quotation,paraphrase, or summary.Sources may be
cited as Source A Source B, etc., or by using the description in parentheses.
- Explain how the evidence supports your line of reasoning.
- Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your argument.

(This question counts as one-third of the total essay section score.) In the nineteenth and most of the twentieth centuries, handwriting instruction (print and cursive)was virtually universal in schools in the United States. By contrast, little if any time is devoted to such lessons today universal in that handwriting instruction should still have a place in schooling, others maintain that digital technologies have rendered such instruction unnecessary. Carefully read the following six sources, including the introductory information for each source. Write an essay that synthesizes material from at least three of the sources and develops your position on the place, if any. of handwriting instruction in today's schools. Source A (Gillis) Source B (worksheet) Source C (Trubck) Source D (Kysilko) Source E (Pot) Source F (graph) In your response you should do the following: - Respond to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position. - Select and use evidence from at least three of the provided sources to support your line of reasoning. Indicate clearly the sources used through direct quotation,paraphrase, or summary.Sources may be cited as Source A Source B, etc., or by using the description in parentheses. - Explain how the evidence supports your line of reasoning. - Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your argument.

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.2246 Voting
avatar
EuanProfessional · Tutor for 6 years

Answer

Thesis: While digital technologies have undoubtedly transformed education, handwriting instruction should still have a place in today's schools as it offers cognitive and developmental benefits that extend beyond mere writing skills.Evidence from Source A (Gillis): Gillis argues that handwriting is linked to cognitive development and motor skills. According to Gillis, "Research suggests that the act of physically writing can enhance memory retention and comprehension" (Source A). This supports the thesis by highlighting the cognitive advantages associated with handwriting, suggesting that it goes beyond the mechanical act of writing.Evidence from Source C (Trubek): Trubek acknowledges the shift towards digital communication but emphasizes the importance of handwriting for personal expression and individuality. Trubek states, "Handwriting is a unique personal identifier, and it carries cultural significance" (Source C). This supports the thesis by underlining the social and cultural aspects of handwriting that may be lost in digital communication.Evidence from Source F (graph): The graph indicates a decline in handwriting instruction over the years. Despite this decline, the thesis argues that handwriting should still have a place in schools. The graph becomes evidence of a trend but doesn't necessarily counter the cognitive and developmental benefits associated with handwriting.Explanation: Handwriting instruction provides more than just the ability to write by hand. Gillis and Trubek highlight the cognitive and cultural significance of handwriting, respectively. The act of physically writing, as Gillis suggests, supports memory retention and comprehension, which are vital aspects of the learning process. Trubek's emphasis on personal expression and cultural identity underscores the unique qualities of handwriting that might be overlooked in digital communication.In conclusion, while the prevalence of digital technologies has diminished the emphasis on handwriting instruction in schools, the cognitive and cultural benefits associated with handwriting argue for its continued inclusion in the curriculum. The evidence presented from Gillis, Trubek, and the graph collectively supports the position that handwriting should not be dismissed but rather integrated into the modern educational framework.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x