Home
/
Law
/
1 point The justices didn't want to enter the "political thicket." Baker v Carr Gray vSanders Reynolds v Sims Colegrovev Green

Question

1 point
The justices didn't want to enter the "political thicket."
Baker v Carr
Gray vSanders
Reynolds v Sims
Colegrovev Green

1 point The justices didn't want to enter the "political thicket." Baker v Carr Gray vSanders Reynolds v Sims Colegrovev Green

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.7252 Voting
avatar
MadisonVeteran · Tutor for 11 years

Answer

The phrase "political thicket" refers to the justices' reluctance to engage in politically contentious matters. This concept arose notably in Baker v. Carr, Reynolds v. Sims, and Gray v. Sanders, where the Supreme Court addressed issues related to legislative apportionment and voting rights, avoiding interference in the political processes. Colegrove v. Green, however, precedes this trend, where the Court declined to intervene in an Illinois apportionment case, suggesting a different stance.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x