Home
/
Business
/
If an employee receives a formal written warning for lateness and is late the following week: The employee should be invited to an investigation meeting, but it is likely that formal proceedings will commence. It may not be appropriate to move on to further formal proceedings after one incident of lateness but the employee could be reminded that he has only just received a warning. Formal disciplinary action should always be taken.

Question

If an employee receives a formal written warning for lateness and is late the following
week:
The employee should be invited to an investigation meeting, but it is likely
that formal proceedings will commence.
It may not be appropriate to move on to further formal proceedings after
one incident of lateness but the employee could be reminded that he has
only just received a warning.
Formal disciplinary action should always be taken.

If an employee receives a formal written warning for lateness and is late the following week: The employee should be invited to an investigation meeting, but it is likely that formal proceedings will commence. It may not be appropriate to move on to further formal proceedings after one incident of lateness but the employee could be reminded that he has only just received a warning. Formal disciplinary action should always be taken.

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.2306 Voting
avatar
ClaraExpert · Tutor for 3 years

Answer

<br />1. The employee should be reminded of the seriousness of continued lateness and apprised of potential repercussions in the form of commencement of formal procedures following a due investigation.<br />2. Advocating for a more forgiving view, the idea viable would be to remind the individual of the just received warning and establish an understanding around necessary improvement without taking up formal proceedings.<br />3. As echoed in the third person's voice, initiation of disciplinary procedures always, leaning towards a zero-tolerance policy could be admissible.

Explain

This statement falls into hypothetical scenarios in a business setting regarding employee behavior/ performance and procedures thereupon. One has to make assumption-based conclusions about procedures in response to action. Entailed involves personal judgment as well as principle-based decision-making aligning to management or HR policies.<br />1. The statement implies that an employee receiving a written warning keeps repeating an unwanted behavior (lateness here). This leads to considerations for stringent measures - which might involve an investigation as indicated in the first statement.<br />2. Cognizance of the degree of the offensive act as being not necessarily severe for starting formal proceedings due to just one instance of lateness is offered in the second statement.<br />3. The third statement advocates for a stricter and more punitive stance. Formal disciplinary action no matter the nature of the repeated occurrence might not always be the best course - professional discretion does take into factor degree of offence, effect on job execution, and human elements like motivation or allowance for personal issues hence being reinforced here implicitly.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x