Home
/
Social Science
/
Thinking Like a Political Scientist Reasoning Process Comparison List at least two categories of comparison that could be used to compare the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1. __ __ Political Science Disciplinary Practices Source Analysis Brutus raised concerns about the elements of the Constitution that proposed moving from a confederation to a federal system. Evaluate the proposed the author used to support these concerns. How well does it used to support these concerns, How woldoesit __

Question

Thinking Like a Political Scientist
Reasoning Process Comparison
List at least two categories of comparison that could be used to
compare the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1.
__
__
Political Science Disciplinary Practices
Source Analysis
Brutus raised concerns about the elements of the Constitution that
proposed moving from a confederation to a federal system. Evaluate the
proposed the author used to support these concerns. How well does it
used to support these concerns, How woldoesit
__

Thinking Like a Political Scientist Reasoning Process Comparison List at least two categories of comparison that could be used to compare the arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1. __ __ Political Science Disciplinary Practices Source Analysis Brutus raised concerns about the elements of the Constitution that proposed moving from a confederation to a federal system. Evaluate the proposed the author used to support these concerns. How well does it used to support these concerns, How woldoesit __

expert verifiedVerification of experts

Answer

4.3291 Voting
avatar
LydiaProfessional · Tutor for 6 years

Answer

1. Categories of Comparison:<br /> - Views on the size and scope of the republic<br /> - Nature and effectiveness of representation<br /><br />2. Evaluation of Brutus's Concerns:<br /> Brutus argued that a large republic would be unmanageable and that representatives would be detached from the people. He used historical examples and logical reasoning to support his concerns. These arguments were well-founded but lacked empirical evidence.

Explain

The question involves comparing arguments in Federalist No. 10 and Brutus No. 1 and evaluating the arguments used by Brutus. Federalist No. 10 discusses the dangers of factions and advocates for a large republic, while Brutus No. 1 argues against a strong central government. Categories of comparison could include views on the size of the republic and the nature of representation.
Click to rate:

Hot Questions

More x